Battlefield Modding Tutorials BFMODS

lol. Nucular. I noticed Palin says it too..... o well...

_________________

_________________

_________________
In the beginning everybody was a SSM NooB.
BFV SSM on server 66.55.142.243
Server Homepage

Well, the vikings did not say it was not a good country. They were the first to find and discover it and some of them stayed. The entire viking expedition never stayed in a place they found. OK, seriously, though, enough of this, how did we get from a speech Obama gave (not 20 miles from me btw) to what the vikings though of the american continent?

_________________

Becouse someone wanted to blame US bad name on other countries.
This is a normal defence, say what bad things others done, this way they might look away and forgot what you did.

Vikings was not even Swedish, Norwegian, Danish or Islandish guys, they where Vikings.
Nordic countries was pressed down by the ice, not much land there at this time.
Yes they lived where this countries are today, but can you blame this countries for what vikings did before they even excisted?
Hey, that T-Rex ate a Diplodocus in Botswana! Ban this country for ever!!!
Shit happened in the past, it wasn't so many rules then.
Look instead in witch way these counties go today, did they turn out for the better or worse?
Now compare to US, is it doing well?
If not, who's to blame for it?
The voters or the President?

_________________
In the beginning everybody was a SSM NooB.
BFV SSM on server 66.55.142.243
Server Homepage

First lets just point out the fact that no-one blamed other peoples countries for Americas short-commings, I stated that you should stop your constant hammering of the Average American Citizen, because It is not their fault that our government lies to us constantly, and that it is not our fault that we are in Iraq or any other part of the world, after we elect the official, which by the way not all of us vote for, they are completely out of the control of the American People, the decision to go to war is not our decision, its his or hers, so stop saying we blamed other countries because that is blatantly wrong and a failure to read what was actually typed.

Secondly, you are lying straight out of your teeth, because according to your so called "clues" which included the copy and pasting of information into google, you went online knowing very little about your countries past, copied a line from wikipedia about the Russo-Swedish war and pasted it into your comment, then claiming that whatever country you lived in was involved with the war, I believe that statement was as follows:

New clue!
The total number of Russian fatalities reached about 17 000 at the end of the battle, while the XXXXXXX troop lost 667 men.
I don't live in Russia!

Which by the way

The total number of Russian fatalities reached about 17 000 at the end of the battle, while the XXXXXXX troop lost 667 men.

is a cut and paste from the wikipedia article which reads: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_XII_of_Sweden
the total number of Russian fatalities reached about 17 000 at the end of the battle, while the Swedish troop lost 667 men.

which the word swedish, hmm rather interesting is that same length as your XXXXXXX, 7 characters. So lets stop lying out of our teeth here urglub, considering it was you who said to search google, AND that it was the first result on the page, and Guess which one that was? Thats right, a wikipedia article on the Russo-Swedish war that had the exact same quote. So lets stop being childish and admit where we live, shall we?

Considering you knew so little about history, lets first point out that the Viking states, which consisted of regions of Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, invaded numerous times territories to the south, and including England. No Viking ever stated the Americas were a bad place, they simply didn't live very long because the journey was too long, but that goes without saying cause the Vikings never lived in the Americas they landed in Greenland which due to the cold climate and dependence on fish killed off their population.

And if someone could please explain to me the Difference between a NATO intervention and a UN peace keeping force, I would be pleased. Because honestly, there is no difference.

Well, all I have to say is... GOOOOO Archi!!! And, well, at one point you were wrong, the president cannot go to war by himself, without the approval of congress. A decision to go to war is like a bill, it must be passed by the House and Senate before the president can approve/veto it. And yes, urg, things were different then, not so many rules, and personally I think the world might be better if it was the way it was then, at least politcally. You need to fight for your survival. Where and how you live shouldn't be determined by how much money you have or how much influence, it should be by your skill with a sword or your aim with an automatic rifle.

_________________

Well while you make and ecellent point the thing is we need rules if you will recall ww2 more civiliand died than soliders because ther was no such thing as war crimes back then ther was no rule saying you cant kill innocent people you sure you want it to be like that with the newest latest technology in nuclear devises that can whipe out civilizations?